Direct answer
That security appropriate to the risk is required, and that pseudonymisation and encryption, together with ongoing confidentiality, integrity, availability and resilience, are named among the measures.
Answer contract
Apply the definition lens only to the exact inspected source scope; do not infer authority from adjacent topics.
Evidence and exact locators
Inspected source 1 — Article 32(1)(a)-(c) — security of processing, including pseudonymisation and encryption.. Supports: The bounded scope recorded in the reviewed specification.
What the evidence does not establish
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Rights and reuse
Rights basis recorded in the reviewed specification; link and bounded original paraphrase only.
Dependencies and related concepts
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:consent:private-compute
governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance
evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:consent
Questions this page can answer
What does Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) state about private-compute?
That security appropriate to the risk is required, and that pseudonymisation and encryption, together with ongoing confidentiality, integrity, availability and resilience, are named among the measures.
Which exact locator in that source supports the claim on this page?
Inspected source 1, Article 32(1)(a)-(c) — security of processing, including pseudonymisation and encryption.
What does this source explicitly not establish about private-compute?
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Which canonical definition does this route depend on, and where is it owned?
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:consent:private-compute governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:consent
What would have to be inspected before this page could claim more than it does?
A source, locator, rights, scope, boundary, dependency, implementation, or release change requires a new exact-revision review.