Direct answer
That sending processing to another party requires a binding instrument that fixes the subject-matter, duration, nature and purpose of that processing.
Answer contract
Apply the definition lens only to the exact inspected source scope; do not infer authority from adjacent topics.
Evidence and exact locators
Inspected source 1 — Article 28(3) — processing by a processor governed by a binding contract setting out subject-matter, duration, nature and purpose.. Supports: The bounded scope recorded in the reviewed specification.
What the evidence does not establish
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Rights and reuse
Rights basis recorded in the reviewed specification; link and bounded original paraphrase only.
Dependencies and related concepts
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:consent:cloud-escalation
governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance
evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:consent
Questions this page can answer
What does Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) state about cloud-escalation?
That sending processing to another party requires a binding instrument that fixes the subject-matter, duration, nature and purpose of that processing.
Which exact locator in that source supports the claim on this page?
Inspected source 1, Article 28(3) — processing by a processor governed by a binding contract setting out subject-matter, duration, nature and purpose.
What does this source explicitly not establish about cloud-escalation?
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Which canonical definition does this route depend on, and where is it owned?
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:consent:cloud-escalation governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:consent
What would have to be inspected before this page could claim more than it does?
A source, locator, rights, scope, boundary, dependency, implementation, or release change requires a new exact-revision review.